If the Downing Street Documents are fake

On Iraq, the so-called Downing Street memo from July 2002 says intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy of removing Saddam through military action. Is this an accurate reflection of what happened? Could both of you respond?

Tony Blair: Well, I can respond to that very easily. No, the facts were not being fixed in any shape or form at all. And let me remind you that that memorandum was written before we then went to the United Nations. Now, no one knows more intimately the discussions that we were conducting as two countries at the time than me. And the fact is we decided to go to the United Nations and went through that process, which resulted in the November 2002 United Nations resolution, to give a final chance to Saddam Hussein to comply with international law. He didn't do so. And that was the reason why we had to take military action.

George Bush: Well, you know, I read, kind of, the characterizations of the memo, particularly when they dropped it out in the middle of his race. I'm not sure who "they dropped it out" is, but I'm not suggesting that you all dropped it out there. (LAUGHTER) And somebody said, "Well, you know, we had made up our mind to go to use military force to deal with Saddam."

This is a pathetic attempt by the mainstream media, which is the propoganda tool for the Republican party, to cover their corruptness and their support of a lying war criminal. The stories that the DSM are fake (actually its only one in question) have already been refuted by Tony Blair and George Bush..

Yikes this is so simple.

peace

note: Feel free to link to this blog, if you wish to reproduce, please credit www.djpauledge.com.